Skip navigation.
Home
Blogging blogs and the bloggers who blog them

Whimsical Monkey's blog

Weblog Awards

blogging | community

The annual Weblog Awards are now open. Maybe you would like to vote for the Best Parenting Blog?

Mommy, am I a racist? Yes, dear, you are

blog against racism | racism

What if you were a racist? How would you know it? Let's do a little introspection to see what's going on in there.

Blogging one step closer to Blogalism

blogging | journalism | politics

Yesterday, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) issued an advisory opinion that finds that Fired Up America should qualify for 'press exemption status' to federal campaign finance laws. Congress defined the press exemption status to ensure that "the unfettered right of the newspapers, TV networks, and other media to cover and comment on political campaigns."

Is speech that powerful?

blogging | free speech

Recently, acts that had been considered protected by "free speech" laws are now seen as illegal. For example, there is currently a case in court regarding a Florida professor (who has been fired). The crime: the professor donated money. Well, he donated money to Palestinians. You can read about the story here and here. Depending on how you think of it, he either is "funding terrorism" or he is "making a choice to support his beliefs". Either way, his involvement with any crime is indirect.

Google vs Government?

current events

Today, two ex-washingtonians from opposite parties show that money can bring the two sides together. They have written an op-ed in The Wahington Times attacking Google. Their article, Reining in Google, is not a careful examiniation of Google's proposal to scan the world's books, but a call to arms to create new laws that prevent them from doing just that.

Us vs. Them

blogging | journalism

Until recently, I believed, like most people probably do, that all journalists were more beholden to higher standards than regular people. I believed that "bloggers" were less credible, just because they were regular people. Journalists have special protection under the law, and I thought that they deserved it. They got paid to be the best that they can be, right? I don't believe any of that anymore. It's not that I trust average people more. But I have seen bad journalists try to wield their influence over average people and it makes me sick. The democracy of blogging seems to be the lesser of two evils and I choose it over so-called "professional" journalists. Below I provide some evidence for these conclusions.

Kleinberg won a MacArthur

blogging | current events | networks

Jon Kleinberg recently won one of the so-called MacArthur Genius Awards from the MacArthur Foundation. The award was announced in September, but I didn't notice that Kleinberg was a winner until just now.

You may remember Kleinberg from Six Degrees or from David Liben-Nowell's recent talk. I see that the Wikipedia has a nice entry on the Six degrees of separation.

High School Bans Blogs

blogging | education

The principal of Pope John XXIII Regional High School in Sparta, NJ has told the students there to quit blogging or face suspension (note that the "real" journalist got the name of the school wrong, but this "just a" blogger checks the facts). He claims that he is doing it for their own protection ("please, think of the children!") but looks more like a freedom of speech issue to me.

Adolescent boys make a movie and give it away

entertainment | open source | sharing

For the first time ever I downloaded a movie from the Internet. Maybe you have done this before, but have you ever done it without breaking any laws? As far as I know, this was the first, full-length motion picture, complete with special effects, made to be released on the Internet for free. Below, you'll find a review, and I'll tell you want you need in order to get the movie.

Microsoft is evil (UPDATED)

technology

Currently there is a dispute raging in Massachusetts over something that may seem overly technical, but it is really quite simple, and gives a good view into Microsoft's evil ways and shows how money can buy spin. I actually don't hate Microsoft's software, but I won't use software from a company that bullies people and companies in illegal ways. Therefore, I don't use any program (or hardware) from Microsoft. No XBox. No Windows. No Word.

Name contest!

community | Katrina

Help! I'm working with some friends in developing a new website to help people get items that they need from others that are willing to donate them. This site will specialize in one group helping out another group. For example, imagine that a school in Africa needs pencils and paper, and a school in Iowa would like to help. Or, a church in New Orleans needs to be rebuilt, and a college group would like to offer some assistance.

Steve lives!

culture | emergence | music

Well, it just goes to show that we all need to double-check those tidbits of information that we hear about over the watercooler. You see, Steve Burns is alive! I was recently told by a large group of bloggers that Steve from "Blues Clues" had died. I was shocked. "Don't tell my daughter," I said. Well, according to Steve, he isn't dead at all. And his mother is glad to hear that too!

Blogging for your mental health

blogging | writing

According to an article at eMarketer.com, most of us blog for ourselves. The article, Blogging for One shows that about half of all of the bloggers surveyed do it for therapy (warning: the article will disappear at the end of this month). Do you find blogging therapeutic? Why would writing in public be significantly different than writing in your private diary?

Sexist terms in computer science?

academics | blogging | writing

Women are vastly underrepresented in computer science, much more so than in other male-dominated fields, such as engineering. Why is that? Here at BMC, we have a hypothesis that subtle sexism permeates the field. And so we explore alternate assignments, curricula, and other ideas (also available as PostScript).

Top ten list

blogging

Tech Goddess and I put these "rules of thumb" together to help provide some guidance in composing effective and influential blog posts. You should always follow these laws, especially #10 :)

  1. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's post, but link to it. Every post should include at least one link.
  2. Thou shalt write to a world audience.
  3. Thou shalt not use the word "interesting". Everything that we read will be interesting. Why do you think it is? Dig!
  4. Thou shalt not use a word processor (such as Microsoft Word). We want you to be able to write without a crutch, and Word can slow you down.

Spinning the web of influence

administrivia

If you want to be a part of the blog community, then you will want to link to others, and want to have them link to you. But how do you do that in your posts and comments? Easy! You just surround the word or phrase that you would like to turn into a link with an HTML <a> tag. For example, if you wanted to point people over to Apathy's blog, you could type this:

<a href="http://woi.brynmawr.edu/apathy">Apathy's blog</a>

If you wanted to make a link that refered to a particular post of Apathy's, first go to that page, copy the URL (the address of that page) and paste it into the href part of the a tag, like so:

All of the bloggers

administrivia

Here is a list of all of the individual bloggers at this groupblog. Notice the web address for each blogger. For example, you can go directly to Abstract Water's blog with the URL http://woi.brynmawr.edu/abstractwater

Spanning communities

community

When I was in highschool, I belonged to two very different groups. On the one hand I was in the rowdiest group in the school: the percussionists. They had a list of vices, and they were working their way down the list.

On the other hand, I also went to church. In fact, I was the president of the youth group for awhile. At first, I believed that I had to have a personality for each group, and it was driving me nuts. I think if I had tried to keep that up, I would have developed a split personality. But you did. No I didn't.

No, instead of trying to be two different people, I tried to "be myself" with both groups, but at that age I didn't know who I was. So, I developed a personality that fit both groups. I discovered that humor could be used with the rowdy group, and with the church-going crowd. That kept me sane, and I was able to develop a "self" that was stable across these two communities. Too bad you weren't funny. I was too!

Hi!

We're setting up the site. We hope you like it.


Comments by Whimsical Monkey


by Whimsical Monkey on Tue, 2005-12-06 08:16
I just heard about a terrible attack on Mirecki. I hope that this is not a sign of things to come. Maybe we should send him some flowers (or spaghetti)? For more information keep an eye on Pharyngula.org.
by Whimsical Monkey on Sun, 2005-12-04 18:12
I agree. Except that Jane Sixpack's $50 bucks doesn't do a lot of good. I do hope that Bill gives back some of the money he stole through the illegal activity of MS over the last decade. And I will try to make sure it doesn't go back to him.
by Whimsical Monkey on Sun, 2005-12-04 18:09
All of these things are under your control. But even if they weren't how does this make the "postulate" "badly put"? This was just a thought experiment to suggest that we all generalize, and that leads to bias. Do you disagree with the basic point that we are all just a little bit racist? (By the way, if you get a chance to see "Avenue Q" on Broadway, there is a great little song about just that.)
by Whimsical Monkey on Sun, 2005-12-04 18:04
Yes, I'm sure she did too. But, it is also true that one can't know about positive or negative racism, nor accurately judge how it could have affected one's life. I find it hard to believe that 80-90 percent of black/hispanic managers are hiring 80% whites. You have a source for this data?
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-12-01 11:26
"I am white, so I wasn't on the receiving end of [racism]." How would you know that you weren't on the receiving end? How many times was your life affected (for better or worse) because of assumptions that people made about you because of your color? Racism can prevent you from getting a job, but it can also get you a job. Or are these two different things?
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-11-28 17:55
This isn't a course that "studies and rejects evolution". That isn't what religion courses (normally) do, and this one isn't any different. This isn't any different from most religion courses (unless you are at a school that supports one religious myth over another). The fellow that claims that the professor "will go down in history" as a "laughing stock" is an attorney. I don't know why they felt like they could go get an opinion from an attorney about some random college course. That's journalism. We're bloggers. We get dentists, not attorneys, to say that we are crazy. (Apathy, I definitely think that you are definitely misspelling particular words just to get my definite goat...)
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-11-14 17:05
"You don't need beauty in an academic paper, you just need to state the facts." I disagree: you should try to make everything you do beautiful. Especially academic papers. But there is an art to it. In what kind of writing would you NOT want to cut out the extra, unnecessary things!
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-11-10 22:12
Very informative post! I do wonder how one "follows" Atheisim, and what it would mean to do it "without flaws"? I don't believe that most of the things on the list from the Atheist link above are only connected with Atheism:
  1. There is no God or devil.
  2. There is no supernatural realm.
  3. Miracles cannot occur.
  4. There is no such thing as sin as a violation of God's will.
  5. Generally, the universe is materialistic and measurable.
  6. Man is material.
  7. Generally, evolution is considered a scientific fact.
  8. Ethics and morals are relative
I suspect there are many religious people that believe many of the above. In fact, can one be religious and not believe in a god?
by Whimsical Monkey on Sun, 2005-11-06 22:55
Definitely, yep, definitely a movie to see. Of course, the story has definitely been altered to make it interesting, but Nash's real work is definitely quite interesting, and produces some non-intuitive results. (Apathy, do you recall any misspelling "pet peeves" from class last week? I definitely do :)
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-10-31 11:25
I dare you to define "cult" in a way that doesn't include organized religion. Can't do it? Don't worry. Tradition, culture, religion, or cult are just categories of perspective on human activities. Aliens wouldn't certainly find our little hairless ape traditions cute. They might even like to keep one or two of us at home for their enjoyment.
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-10-31 11:10
I'm in no way defending anyone's actions or decisions. But as you think about what you might want to do to make the situation better, think about the subtlety of what has happened. Is your college hiding the fact that it really isn't diverse? There are colleges that have been caught doing that recently. For example, a number of places of higher-ed had to "stage" photos so that blacks and whites could be seen together. Another university actually went so far as to cut out a photo of a black kid and insert it into a photo of a group of whites at a football game. Maybe their intentions were good (they want more minorities to feel welcome at their school). Does the ends justify the means? Rarely. Where does your college fit in along this spectrum of evils? If you are comparing to utpoia (how appropriate this week, nes pas?) that's one thing. But maybe a realive comparison is in order. And action based on how to make it better. Also, I don't think diversity is just a liberal value. Diversity is a very good strategy for all kinds of people solving all kinds of problems (e.g., "don't put all your eggs in one basket").
by Whimsical Monkey on Sat, 2005-10-29 23:58
Thanks, Vincent, both for changing your word choice and for the hint about bugmenot... didn't know about that!
by Whimsical Monkey on Sat, 2005-10-29 19:46
I think that you'll find that those with PhD's (like journalists) are just regular people with all of the desires and problems. I beg to differ about PhD's reading the Onion. In fact, I bet the percentage of PhDs that read the Onion is pretty high. But it ain't a newspaper, and doesn't have "opinions" so you can't compare it to the NYTimes. But I bet that the more education you have, the more humor you need! Most people don't complain about Fox because it is flashy. No, but it is dang biased! You won't find critisims of Bush there. Why not? Because that isn't attention grabbing? No, because they are biased! According to how you describe "news" I'd claim that journalism is already dead. The soundbyte producer is not a journalist.
by Whimsical Monkey on Sat, 2005-10-29 09:26
Exactly. And once people realize that both can be biased (or not), they'll read many differing views (blogs), and not give journalists any special treatment. That will, in the end, lead to the end of journalism as we know it. There are some good journalists. But I just don't think we need them anymore.
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-10-28 15:05
Tom: Hey, Sally, you look down. Sally: Yeah, I totally blew my CSEM midterm. Tom: Well, here, how about a Chewy Mint Mentos Sour? Sally: Uhhh, no thanks. Tom: Come on, they're new, and the tangiest way to feel a fresh squeeze in your cheeks. They are available in 3 sour-licious flavors: watermelon, green apple, and lemon. Sally: Ok, I'll try one. Tom: That'll be 89 cents. But if you buy two packs, and sell one to your mom, I'll give 'em to you for 79 cents each. Sally: Do you miss the days when we weren't always trying to sell each other stuff? I do. In fact I have the first season of "Friends" on DVD for only $9.99. You want it?
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-10-19 12:48
As should your comments about this site... :) But not my comments; I'm Whimsical Monkey! That's my real name. Seriously though, we blog anonymously on this course website for very specific reasons. One is that we weren't sure how long these writings will remain here. People change alot in college, and we didn't want the views one holds as an entering firstyear student to be always be associated (via google) with a person's name. Also, we wanted to avoid any possibility of "stalkers". So, we debated for quite some time about whether or not to be anonymous, and decided that it was the right choice for us.
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-10-19 11:22
Anonymous said "I believe the college's punishment would have been less severe if the student's verbage was not online." I think that this is true, but I also think that you conflate "online" with "permanently available for all to read." For example, if the student said the comments in a hallway, or on the phone, or anonymously in a park with a megaphone, they have a certain impact, interpretation, and then they fade. People can even argument about what was really said later. But, currently, online comments last forever and have an impact far beyond ephemeral speech. Maybe this suggest technology to help make anonymous (or even non-anonymous) online materials have less impact: comments only last for a short period. It's an interesting idea that would change the dynamics of blogging, for sure.
by Whimsical Monkey on Tue, 2005-10-18 01:21
Correction: Rather did not fabricate the documents, but was fooled by someone who did. A huge difference! Also, the bloggers made a big deal about the forged documents, but the original point was completely lost: where was George Bush when he was supposed to be at National Guard Duty? So, the bloggers didn't do so good in attempting to shine a bright light on all darkness in this story, but it was a good thing to expose the fakes.
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-10-12 23:11
I must admit that I hadn't even heard of Firefly. But a friend loaned me the first season DVD collection, and I was hooked. I watched about 7 or 8 episodes---just enough to get to know the characters. Then I went to see "Serenity" and it was great! Truly the most fun I've had at a movie in a while. Since I saw it, I've read some more about Whedon, the series, and the movie. I think I'm going to have to see it again. For example, I didn't really notice the details of the opening scene. Also, I read that Orson Scott Card says: "And I'll tell you this right now: If Ender's Game can't be this kind of movie, and this good a movie, then I want it never to be made. I'd rather just watch Serenity again." I don't read a lot of sci-fi, but I did read Card's Ender's Game which I really loved, and Serenity is a good story too. (Rumors of an Ender's Game movie?) In any event, Serenity is highly recommended!
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-10-06 08:23
Try reading this again, but replace "banana" with "human"---many of the same points apply. We don't live and reproduce anymore without help. Will we last longer than the banana?
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-10-05 15:55
The most shocking part for me was that the lie mattered to anyone! What if you found out today that you were of a different race than you thought and that you had been checking the wrong box your whole life? In what way would that make you a different person? Personally, it wouldn't matter at all. I am me. I also doubt that he was the rebellious "black sheep" for no reason. His mother obviously is racist; she says "Any black who rapes a woman will say she asked for it." Yikes! Calling Bill Bennett! I'd bet money that she (maybe not so subtly) saw her boy as something less than her "white" children.
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 15:36
Whew. This guy has lost his mind. He says, from the article you point to: "I don't think people have the right to be angry, if they look at the whole thing. But if they get a selective part of my comment, I can see why they would be angry. If somebody thought I was advocating that, they ought to be angry. I would be angry. But that's not what I advocate." It is not that we are angry because we think that he is advocating aborting babies. We are angry because he thinks that blacks are repsonsible for crime. Does he not understand that, or is he trying to spin the problem in a different direction?
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 12:48
Also see G33K's discussion on the size of the blogosphere.
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 12:28
What else can one say? You might ask yourself what you can do about such people. One thing would be to diminish their influence on others. I would say you could boycott his sponsors, but he barely has any. Of course, there will always be stupid people just trying to "get your goat."
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 08:53
Replying to my own comment? How rude?! But the Goddess and I were looking into how big the blogiverse has gotten. We estimate that there are probably, on average, between 800 and 1000 posts every minute. That's over a million posts per day. Accumulating. And growing faster. So little time...
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 08:42
This is true, and even worse than you say. It isn't just Microsoft that wishes it, but every business. Its called "Digital Rights Management" (DRM) and could effect everything from movies to spread sheets. The basic idea is that software would determine your rights, and they would be decided by the maker of the software. If this sounds like a bad idea, you're right. See the Wikipedia entry on DRM for a fairly balanced discussion.
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 00:33
I don't think I'd worry about it too much. Someone like Google will come along and do it for free. Oh, they already have!
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 00:29
If there were interest, I'm sure the Goddess and I would be up to altering the site. But first you'd need a plan, then a prototype, and then you'd have to actually do it within the technological constraints of our software. That is, you'd have to edit a template and the CSS. Bounce some ideas off of all of us at WOI. Maybe a contest is in order? Also, the Goddess and I were discussing the possibility of letting each of you be able to alter the looks of your own site. We'll look into it...
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 00:23
Actually, it is very relevant. MS has done a very good job of preventing you from even knowing if it is possible to run other systems on your computer! They are good at what they do! We'll have to have a "software liberation day" and I'll show you how you too can be free of the repression.
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-30 00:17
Like most things, blogging was built on the shoulders of those who came before. 15 years ago, you would have been reading Usenet newsgroups (basically, email that went to a central location where people could subscribe to it.) Before that, there were "bulletin board systems" (BBS) systems that you could dial into. Before that, real bulletin boards. I think this has been part of the human condition for a very long time. I hadn't seen weblogs.com before. Did you see any WOI posts go by?
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-09-29 14:13
Welcome back, Anonymous. As far as our "responsibility to society" goes, I think we are fulfilling our duty. The basic point is, who should have more influence:
  • an Anonymous commenter from the internet
  • a professor from an elite institution
  • a young woman in her first year of college
  • Jerry Springer
  • a comedian fake-news caster
  • some well-known blogger sitting on his couch
Each of these exert influence. Some more than others. To deny that Jerry Springer has influence is to climb into our ivory tower and ignore a large segment of our population. We are studying these influences, not confusing ourselves with them. But we don't get to pick who gets to have influence, it happens through some process. That is what we are studying, and we are continuing our national/international reputation by exploring this in a very novel way: students are blogging, out in the open, for all to see. What would you rather have?
  • prevent them from blogging
  • prevent them from blogging in the open
  • assign them topics to write about
  • delete their posts if they uses words that anonymous readers may object to
  • only allow posts if they are approved (to meet some standards)
  • tell them that they are writing to represent BMC and that they will be penalized in some way if they deviate from "the rules"
If you believe any of the above, then you have different goals than we do. And that's fine. But, I suggest that you might want to take a look at some of the fine writing that these women have written, and congratulate them for that. I think that, left to themselves, they might end up where you think they should be, but they will have done it on their own. And that is a very fine path to take.
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-09-29 09:21
Greetings, Anonymous! And welcome to our blog. First, we appreciate your tenacity in making your point, and we appreciate your engagement on a topic that you feel strongly about. I don't think I buy your argument that if we clean up our language we will be seen as something serious, and if we allow profanity then we won't. Two points of evidence: 1. If you read Eschaton you will find the same language, or worse. This is one of the most influential blogs on the planet. 2. If you watch The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, you will also find the same language. The Daily Show surely has to be changing TV news, in spite of the strong language. Both of these productions are seen as very influential, and that is what we are studying. Of course, that doesn't mean that using strong language will lead to influence, but it should be explored. And that is what we are studying. I do appreciate your point that this could be seen as the basis for other writing and educational courses. But I also believe that students need to be able to test the boundaries themselves, and explore. Where this goes is up to the students. But, to quote Superman's dad, "With great power comes great responsibility."
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-09-26 21:38
You can do it right now:
  1. login
  2. click on categories
  3. click on add term (not add vocabulary)
  4. enter "motion mondays" and click "Submit"
  5. go back to your post
  6. click on "edit" above your post
  7. right click on "motion mondays" (right click allows multiple topics/categories)
Now, your post will show up in Technorati whenever someone looks for that tag. Cool!
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-09-26 17:29
Why is it I trust some web sites over a bunch of convinced bloggers? :) Seriously, though, how will we come to trust some information and not others? I only see it getting more difficult as time goes on...
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-09-26 17:22
You should make a topic/category called "motion monday" and put it on your post. Then we can tell others about this idea.
by Whimsical Monkey on Sun, 2005-09-25 20:01
Not bad, but "dot to dot dot org" could be very ambiguous:
  • dot2dot.org
  • dottwodot.org
  • .too..org
embrace.org doesn't really describe what it does, and isn't suggestive. Thanks for the ideas, and keep 'em coming!
by Anonymous on Sun, 2005-09-25 16:59
It seems that anyone that wanted to have pictures printed that were rejected for any reason could easily print them themselves. Printer companies will basically give you a printer (because they make their money on the ink). Computers keep coming down in price. Why don't they just print it themselves? As long as there are ways around any particular roadblock (set there by government, big business, or your grandma) it doesn't seem that you have a legitimate claim to censorship. What are the funniest pictures that you ever had to develop? Surely you have some good stories that you can share? :)
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-23 09:40
I agree that some parts of the government would love to make some money off of the backs of the common person. But, the Internet was designed to be a decentralized system. The prototype of the Internet was first designed and built by what is now part of the Department of Defense. Because the engineers wanted it to be robust, they made it decentralized. It is Technological Democracy at its best. Yeah for the engineers! This means that anyone that can get a computer on the Internet can send email to whomever they wish. There is no centralized place where you would need to "buy an e-stamp". Of course this has a down-side: spam. But I wouldn't be worried about losing control or having to pay money to the government. I'd be worried about losing control or having to pay money to big business.
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-09-22 09:46
When I went to the state college (about an hour away from where I grew up) I lived in a multicultural dorm. My dorm mates would always point out the funny ways I pronounced cetain words, such as: SEE ment (cement) INN surance (insurance) (Why were we talking about cement and insurance anyway?) And of course, the leaving off of the "ng" of any word that ends in "-ing" (runun, talkun, gonna). But I associated the accent with my family and community's racism; they spoke this way, and were prejudiced against anyone that was different. So I changed the way that I talked. I guess it was an outward sign that I wanted to show that I wasn't racist like my family. Of course, I still slip into the old thinking and speech patterns every once in a while, but now I usually catch myself.
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-09-21 09:23
Pardon the pun, but there seems to be a "missing link" in your comment.
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-09-21 09:21
I think many people believe that AIDS in Africa is a world problem. Not just because we "are all in this together," but because this is going to spread into your backyard, literally. How can you prioritize the poor in this country with the dying of another? Let's try to take care of both! It doesn't have to be an either/or proposition.
by Whimsical Monkey on Tue, 2005-09-20 21:10
This could be one of those "memes" that go around. Every week or so, someone should write a post titled "Suggestion box" (with a special "suggestionbox" topic) and list 5 (or so) little ideas they have to make the world a better place. Of course, commentors can join in.
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-09-19 21:56
Your first question, "why is it fair that i dont have internet service because some people are using up all the bandwidth?" isn't really about technology at all. It's about living with other humans. These are issues related to any natural, or unnatural, limited resource. What are your options?
  • grassroots: talk to the offenders, and work out an agreement
  • dictator: She will take care of it...
  • democracy: justice administered in proportion to the crime by a jury of peers
But, there could be a technological solution to prevent others from hogging the bandwidth. In fact, there normally is. You should have received an email stating that the normal solution is temporarily down. The normal solution is to limit the amount of bandwidth devoted to movies, music, and other large data transfers. The college has decided the solution to stealing software is just to make it painful by making it slow to download. Of course, as Tech Goddess noted, not everyone is stealing, but it is going to be slow anyway for everyone; how could they tell if it is a legit download, vs a illegit one? They can't. And, in fact, they never will be able to. Your second issue is about becoming too dependent on technology. I think that we are, and that's ok. We just always need a "Plan B". What happens when we run out of gas and oil? How are we going to get food and water? Technology is great when it works, but you better always have a Plan B. Your third issue will be moot. You aren't going to die. At least not of natural decay. Medicine will solve those problems through technology. However, you might want to have a Plan B.
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-09-15 21:41
If you take some computer science courses, you'll see exactly what this is. I wouldn't call it math, but computation. This is a very well-done site, and one I hadn't seen before. It can even handle if you "accidently" lie on a question or three. Thanks!
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-09-15 08:24
That sounds like a good idea, Bill. Maybe we weren't entering enough query terms in our test searches using Google's Blog search. Do you have some data that suggest that you might be right, or did you read something about their mechanisms? I read everything on Google's site about their Blog search I can find, but it was pretty skimpy.
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-09-14 22:35
I've been meaning to see that for a while; I'll have to see if I can catch it on cable. I did see The Laramie Project and would recommend it. It is very sad, though. We might not ever reach exactly where we want to be, but I hope we keep trying.
by Whimsical Monkey on Wed, 2005-09-14 22:27
I suspect that the Google Blog search will get much better. First, they need to accumulate some data, and then really apply their magic touch. If you have seen what they have done with Google Scholar or Google Maps, then you may have some pretty high expectations. I suspect they will try to make it look like Google News. But will it be better than www.memeorandum.com?
by Whimsical Monkey on Tue, 2005-09-13 23:31
If a word or phrase bothers someone, then one really can't claim "well, it shouldn't bother you." You just have to accept it; you can't use logic to make it not bother them. If that word or phrase bothers a whole group of people, and that group is alienated, it makes sense to wonder about a possible cause and effect. Do I think that by calling something by a different name is going to turn around an entire field and suddenly women won't be underrepresented anymore? No, but using different metaphors might have a subtle influence that is hard to describe exactly. For example, you can imagine some computer science instructor expanding on the "promiscuous" theme in order to explain the networking hardware. This could possibly drive the wedge in even further. I appreciate your experiment, but I think the numbers are just too small to make the claim that it is racist. 94 is only about 4 times larger than 25 (and that is out of 8 billion web pages). Recall that "promiscuous woman" is 45 times more common than "promiscuous man". That surely reflects a common usage, and I do not want to alienate anyone over something that can easily be avoided.
by Whimsical Monkey on Sun, 2005-09-11 10:49
I think we have to be skeptical about any claims until we examine the issue from multiple sources. I wonder about the process to convert corn to ethanol: how much does that cost? how much energy is envolved? can it be cost effective without subsidies from the government? Beware of getting an story from a single source, especially if that single source has something to gain by influencing you. Does the National Ethonal Vehicle Coalition have something to gain? Let's find out what...
by Whimsical Monkey on Sat, 2005-09-10 17:58
True, I didn't list "under the influence." There are a couple of others that we can vote on too. I just started out with the ones that mentioned blogging. I suspect that we can design a shirt that incorporates more than one. For example, "under the influence" could be combined with any of the above.
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-09 10:45
Obviosuly you are a passionate person who thinks and cares a lot about what is going on around you. And you have taken the time and energy to attempt to make this world better. I wonder, though, if your method will influence your intended audience. For example, have you ever changed your mind when someone is YELLING AT YOU? (Uppercase letters are usually equated with yelling in email and blogs.) Probably not. Are you trying to cause a change? If not, then maybe this isn't the appropriate place. If you do want to cause a change with your influence, then will this approach be effective? What do you think is the root cause of these things? What are the salad workers thinking about? Are they bored? Tired? Overworked? Maybe you can start-up a conversation and try to see the world from their perspective. What is the relationship between food you don't eat and the hunger someplace else in the world? Seriously, this would be a good question to explore. I think you can be much more effective at influencing people if you don't start off with an attack, but ask yourself "why does this bother me?" and then attempt to explore your own answer. You have a lot packed into this single post. You should try this again, but not all at once! I think most bloggers have ideas that build up over days and weeks, and then they tie together all of the related thoughts with a post. You have at least three, big, unconnected ideas. I don't think we rant here because we can, but because we think we can make a difference. We don't want to hurt people's feelings, but help to make everything work better. As Spiderman's dad said "with great power comes great responsibility."
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-09-05 11:05
From http://www.gnu.org/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt: When I was going to kindergarten, the teachers were trying to teach us this attitude -- the spirit of sharing -- by having us do it. They figured if we did it, we'd learn. So they said, "If you bring candy to school, you can't keep it all for yourself; you have to share some with the other kids." Teaching us, the society was set up to teach, this spirit of cooperation. And why do you have to do that? Because people are not totally cooperative. That's one part of human nature, and there are other parts of human nature. There are lots of parts of human nature. So, if you want a better society, you've got to work to encourage the spirit of sharing. You know, it'll never get to be 100%. That's understandable. People have to take care of themselves too. But if we make it somewhat bigger, we're all better off. Nowadays, according to the U.S. Government, teachers are supposed to do the exact opposite. "Oh, Johnny, you brought software to school. Well, don't share it. Oh no. Sharing is wrong. Sharing means you're a pirate." What do they mean when they say "pirate"? They're saying that helping your neighbor is the moral equivalent of attacking a ship...
by Whimsical Monkey on Mon, 2005-09-05 06:45
Many people here at BMC have been wrestling with how to deal with "intelligent design" vs. evolution. Some say that "intelligent design" is creationism dressed up in science clothing. That was the point of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM). If we teach ID as science, why not FSMism? On the other hand, there is, of course, room for faith in science, if one is so inclined. Here is one of BMC scientists' views: Intelligent Design and the Story of Evolution: No Need for Drawing Lines in the Sand. I don't know if I agree with this position, yet. What do you think?
by Whimsical Monkey on Fri, 2005-09-02 10:08
No need to apologize for not being on some imagined topic. Great post!
by Whimsical Monkey on Thu, 2005-09-01 18:09
Oh and as a suggestion, maybe the moderators of this blog could reduce the number of blogs that are visible on the front page at a time. That way, the infamous post will disappear in a jumping flash. We discussed how many posts to put on the front page, and wanted to make sure that your posts would stay up there long enough. We didn't think about them staying up too long though :) This issue will fade soon enough, I think, without having to manipulate the system. Everyone could post something very engaging, and no one will even notice...
XML feed