Skip navigation.
Home
Blogging blogs and the bloggers who blog them

Conjoined Twins and Parasidic Twins

I am reading a book called Mutants by Armand Marie Leroi about genetic variety and the human body. It discusses many genetic disorders that cause different abnormalities in the structure and function of the body. The book is very interesting and has a great deal of information in it that is both intriguing and educational.

First, Leroi discusses the fact that what separates a mutation from a variant is that a mutation must be both rare and harmful. Every person has genetic variants that distinguish our hair, eye, and skin color. Interestingly enough, the average person has about three mutant genes in them that can cause invisible problems not visible to every day life. Therefore, are we not all mutants in addition to those who merely look different?

One of the discussions in the book is conjoined twins. Leroi sites a famous case of conjoined twins: Ritta and Christina Parodi. He also discusses the issue of deciding whether a conjoined twin is two separate people or not. Does it depend on whether connected babies have two heads, two hearts, two sets of vital organs etcetera. There are many interesting cases of conjoined twinning: Giacomo and Giovanni Batista Tocci, Masha and Dasha Krivoshlyopova, Yvonne and Yvette McCarther, and many more.

Another deformity is the parasitic twin; a live person that has an attached inanimate body.

Another deformity is cyclopia (viewer discretion advised.) This occurs when the frontal lobe of the brain is not able to split in early fetal development. It is, surprisingly, the most common of all brain deformities in humans. It affects 1 out of 16 thousand live births and 1 out of every 200 miscarriages.

This information hints merely at the first three chapters of the book, which goes on extensively on a variety of other topics. Knowing about these mutations and deformities can help us see exactly how lucky we are to have two eyes, one nose, a mouth, two legs and arms etcetera.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Mutants!

Just overload of works and information! You must had hard time put them together ;) Personally, I do not feel comfortable calling another human being a "mutant." It just makes me feel weird and I think I will have different perspectives toward that person whether I realize it or not. I found some of the pictures of deformations were very disturbing and I had to close the internet windows immediately. Still, all the facts and the pictures above were based on true research and stories. Some of the stories of twins were just unexplainable. The story has the context of mystery but medical truth. Statistically, for me to meet the "people with different looks" would be very hard and rare; however, it is still agonizing to know that things that I would never understand or want happened and will happen anyways.

"Mutant" : Dragged Down By it's Connotation

In the book, he addresses the problem of calling people mutants. To imply that a person with a sequence of genes that has mutated is a mutant is to imply a deviation from an idea of perfection. Who then, is perfect? Is there any definite human genome (the human genome)? No, the beauty of genetic variety is the differences among all of us. The word "mutant" is used scientifically. Note the difference in connotation vs. denotation. The book is purely scientific, and the words it uses may seem brutally obtuse, but in the long run, the words are used correctly.

Never Regret the Biggest Mistake of Your Life

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.